They don’t seem to decide what’s good or not out of the bottom of their hat. What “I” think is a good hub (article) seems to be good to them too. Hubpages’ got More Common SenseĪnother advantage I find about Hubpages over Squidoo is that they are easier to figure out. Unlike Squidoo, Hubpages results make sense. If I type “ my name hubpages” in Google search I come up in first position with the oldest page I’ve created on this account (which is about 3 weeks old) on second position right after my profile page. I recently started using Hubpages again (on a new account) using my first and last name as username since my name is an important keyword as far as I’m concerned. I haven’t edited any of those articles for years either, yet it’s ranking perfectly all right. I have used Hubpages in the past using a username instead of my name, and if I Google “ my username hubpages” it’s the first result. So, my conclusion about Squidoo is I won’t use it for quite some time, unless they get their act together. And last, but not least, they don’t seem to rank well anymore. They are impossible to communicate with, and that’s not only my observation, but many people I know as well. They don’ t always reward good content, while some not so good content still slide in. ![]() I’m sure they probably mean well, and like any other article platform they are looking for valuable content, but they are the most confused content place I know. Yes, that’s true, but when was the last time that I did anything about MySpace or Blogger? I can’t even remember, but it’s been a few years. Some might say that it’s because I haven’t updated my lenses in over a year. In my book, this means that Squidoo doesn’t rank well. That tells you something here doesn’t it? Where is Squidoo? I have to go on page three to find my first Squidoo lens result.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |